John M. O'Hara
30Jan/100

Policy Prescription for Obama

In a new post at Big Government, Peter Fotos and I answer President Obama's call for help by giving him three simple health care policy prescriptions:

In his State of the Union Address Wednesday night, President Obama called on folks to let him know if there are better health care solutions he and congress should be considering...

...He echoed this sentiment at today’s House GOP retreat. Some might say he was being sarcastic, reminding us of how hard it is to govern (especially in light of all he has inherited from you-know-who.) But that would be cynical, particularly in this post-partisan era.

Just before Christmas my colleague Peter Fotos and I penned a “wish list” of simple policy proposals that constitute substantive health care reform – and it didn’t even take 1,000 pages! The health care snitch line was disabled, so we’ll give the President the benefit of the doubt that it ended up in his spam folder.

President Obama and his Congressional allies talk a lot about the need to control health care costs and avoid pressure from special interests. Unfortunately, neither the House nor the Senate versions of “ObamaCare” that he called upon congress to reconsider withstand either litmus test.

Click here for more.

27Jan/100

SOTU Wish: Stop Talking

In my debut piece at The Daily Caller, I outline why Americans are so frustrated with President Obama just one year after his inauguration: the rhetoric and the reality just don't match up.  President Obama has broken the trust of the American people too many times in such a short window of time.  It's time for less talk and more (substantive) action.

Below, Paul Bedard at US News & World Report has a great wrap-up of the growing discontent across party lines throughout the nation.

27Jan/100

Puzzling Media Attention Re. One Tea Party

The New York Times and other outlets that haven’t given the enormously popular and politically potent tea party movement the time of day over the past year are suddenly quite interested in covering it.

Many political and media elites wrote the movement off as “fringe” – an irrelevant, small cadre of disgruntled right-wingers not worthy of their attention. As I told the Washington Times, know that they smell a hint of controversy, they’re suddenly quite intrigued.

Many in the media are quick to point out the missteps of this one group in TN throwing a convention with Sarah Palin as signs that the movement is in trouble.  They see one event, one organization hitting bumps in the road and conclude from there that there is a significant rift in the movement.

It is particularly curious given that these very journalists, commentators, and politicians have to date characterized the movement as directionless and leaderless.  The former has been proven untrue beyond doubt in the wake of the election of Scott Brown in my bluer than blue home state of Massachusetts.  The later is true: this isn’t a top down movement by any means, and I argue that it doesn’t need a leader.  This movement’s power comes from the millions of concerned Americans that constitute it.  The movement rejects the creepy idolatry exhibited in the past presidential campaign. It represents an important shift away from partisanship and personalities to principles.

If only there was one book out there journos could take for a spin that clearly articulates the history of and principles behind this powerful grassroots movement…

The bottom line is, if millions of people getting involved in the political process through protests, town halls, and marches over the past year weren’t newsworthy, the attention given to a couple thousand in TN is…curious.  Maybe I’m just being cynical.

21Jan/100

MA Senate Race & The Tea Parties

I jumped on with Neil Cavuto on Fox Business last night to discuss the MA Senate vote and the tea party movement:

Filed under: Commentary No Comments
20Jan/100

The Electoral Counterrevolution

Last night Scott Brown clinched the MA Senate race with a solid 5 point lead. More from the good folks at the Boston Herald here.

This is a huge victory for the tea party and for the millions of Americans the recognize the threat of ever-expanding government exemplified in policies like ObamaCare, the bailouts, cap and trade, and the rest of the President's radical agenda.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco summed it up best before the final tally.  As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle:

"Regardless of the outcome ... this should be a gigantic wake-up call to the Democratic Party - that we're not connecting with the needs, the aspirations and the desires of real people right now," said San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom.

It gets even better:

...But Newsom said the Republican resurgence in Massachusetts suggests "there's real intensity and fervor out there, as represented by the Tea Party" activists expressing anger at government spending and at job losses.

"This is real," he said. "At our own peril, we dismiss these tea parties as ... some sort of isolated extremism. ... It's not."

I couldn't have said it better myself.

18Jan/100

The Counterrevolution Continues

More and more Americans are rejecting the empty rhetoric of hope and change and the government-knows-best philosophy of President Obama and his congressional allies.

This response to the radical policies of this administration - embodied in the tea party movement - is what I refer to as a counterrevolution in A New American Tea Party. It is a gut reaction millions of Americans are having to the rapid expansion of the size and reach of government and the fiscal crash course our nation is on. These aren't Democrat and Republican issues - these are American issues.

All things considered, it should not be too surprising that my home state of Massachusetts may be 24 hours from electing Republican Scott Brown to the late Ted Kennedy's Senate seat.

President Obama just visited MA to boost Democrat Martha Coakley's support. The only thing is, President Obama is part of the problem for Coakley, not part of the solution.   The underlying factors behind the unexpectedly close race in MA are symptomatic of a larger dissatisfaction with the President's radical agenda.  His big government boondoggles have his support at record lows nationally.  A mere 26% of likely Massachusetts voters approve of the President's flagship health care plan dubbed ObamaCare.  Only 48% approve of his job rating - this in a state that he won handily. Nationwide, a recent Washington Post poll reveals that 58% of Americans favor smaller government.

Massachusetts voters are right to be skeptical.  They have had a taste of "universal" health care.  The result? Long waits and higher prices. It is no surprise that they appose their own plan and exporting such a flawed policy to the rest of the nation. As Jon Keller writes in today's Wall Street Journal:

Support for the state's universal health-care law, close to 70% in 2008, is also in free fall; only 32% of state residents told Rasmussen earlier this month that they'd call it a success, with 36% labeling it a failure. The rest were unsure. Massachusetts families pay the country's highest health insurance premiums, with costs soaring at a rate 7% ahead of the national average, according to a recent report by the nonpartisan Commonwealth Fund.

When the folks back in my home state of Massachusetts - and believe me these aren't "right-wing radicals" - think the government is overstepping its bounds, it is time for President Obama and Democrats in Washington to make a major course correction.

Regardless of who wins this race, the fact that what should have been a done deal for Democrats is this close signals a victory for the tea party movement and serves as a warning shot over the bows of big spending, big government incumbents off all stripes as we enter the 2010 election cycle.

15Jan/100

The Weather Is Cool, Environmental Alarmism Isn’t

Great video compilation from my friend and colleague Jim Lakely:

Filed under: Environment No Comments
15Jan/100

Tonight – Milt Rosenberg Interview

Tonight I'll be chatting with Milt Rosenberg on Extension 720 from 9pm-11pm Central.

You can listen live online and call in in the second hour!

14Jan/100

Book Review

Thoughtful review of A New American Tea Party by Warner Todd Houston at RedCounty.com and Canada Free Press:

…The first thing one might notice is that O’Hara writes in a crisp, conversational style with short subchapters. This makes it ideal for reading bits at a time. This is not a dense treatment and I think his style makes the book very accessible to people of all ages — without talking down to the young or dumbing it down for the more advanced reader.

… details every manner of extreme left-wing trial balloon floated by Obamaists prior to the Tea Party movement hitting the streets.

… O’Hara’s tale of the Tea Party movement is worth reading and is the best source of “hope and change” I’ve seen since Obama won office.

See the full piece here.

13Jan/102

RedCounty.com Interview


Check out my interview with Chip Hanlon over at Red County regarding A New American Tea Party.

Update: Red County book review by Warner Todd Houston.