<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John M. O&#039;Hara &#187; A New American Tea Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnmohara.com/category/a-new-american-tea-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnmohara.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:17:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Get On Board!</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/09/03/get-on-board/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/09/03/get-on-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in Illinois, we are engaging tea party activists and concerned citizens across the state to turn what has become known as the land of Blago and Obama back on the path to prosperity. If you're an Illinois resident or in the area this fall, get on board! To learn more check out IllinoisTurnaround.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/to-H8e46K5s?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/to-H8e46K5s?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Here in Illinois, we are engaging tea party activists and concerned citizens across the state to turn what has become known as the land of Blago and Obama back on the path to prosperity.</p>
<p>If you're an Illinois resident or in the area this fall, get on board!</p>
<p>To learn more check out <a href="http://www.IllinoisTurnaround.com">IllinoisTurnaround.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/09/03/get-on-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discussing Tea Parties on MSNBC</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/04/14/discussing-tea-parties-on-msnbc/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/04/14/discussing-tea-parties-on-msnbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m9WaTQ8Q9LA&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m9WaTQ8Q9LA&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/04/14/discussing-tea-parties-on-msnbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hope for Change</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/04/04/hope-for-change/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/04/04/hope-for-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The partisans in Washington that recently jammed through ObamaCare despite widespread public opposition may very well loose their jobs come November, but that's little comfort to Americans concerned about the legislation's long-term detrimental impact on the nation. Fortunately, there's an old piece of paper meant to keep the nation's leaders in check even after they've [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The partisans in Washington that recently jammed through ObamaCare despite widespread public opposition may very well loose their jobs come November, but that's little comfort to Americans concerned about the legislation's long-term detrimental impact on the nation.</p>
<p>Fortunately, there's an old piece of paper meant to keep the nation's leaders in check even after they've hopped over every procedural hurdle and bent every rule to get their way regardless of the will and interest of the people: the United States Constitution.</p>
<p>The efforts of a dozen or so state Attorneys General and legislatures to mount opposition to ObamaCare has been couched by many cynical commentators as pointless, legally impotent wheel spinning.  The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704896104575140063408610580.html">ran</a> a heartening piece last week that paints a much more hopeful picture by taking a look at the implications of some of the more egregious parts of the bill, such as the insurance mandate, on the role and power of the federal government:</p>
<blockquote><p>...if Congress can force Americans to buy a product, the question is what remains of the government of limited and enumerated powers, as provided in Article I. The only remaining restraint on federal power would be the Bill of Rights, though the Founders considered those 10 amendments to be an affirmation of the rights inherent in the rest of the Constitution, not the only restraint on government. If the insurance mandate stands, then why can't Congress insist that Americans buy GM cars, or that obese Americans eat their vegetables or pay a fat tax penalty?</p></blockquote>
<p>Click <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704896104575140063408610580.html">here</a> for the full piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/04/04/hope-for-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strange brew: The Coffee Party</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/15/strange-brew-the-coffee-party/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/15/strange-brew-the-coffee-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coffee Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My latest piece at The Daily Caller: In a tacit admission of the Tea Party’s success, backers of the wildly unpopular big-government, liberty-crushing policies of the Obama administration are brewing up their own movement—the Coffee Party. It all allegedly started with a random musing in a post by Annabel Park on Facebook in which she [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailycaller.com"><img class="size-full wp-image-1177 alignleft" title="logo" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/logo.gif" alt="" width="237" height="28" /></a></p>
<p>My latest piece at The Daily Caller:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a tacit admission of the Tea Party’s success, backers of the wildly unpopular big-government, liberty-crushing policies of the Obama administration are brewing up their own movement—the Coffee Party. It all allegedly started with a random musing in a post by Annabel Park on Facebook in which she called for an alternative to the Tea Party movement.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/15/strange-brew-the-coffee-party/#ixzz0iFt8Vcb8">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/15/strange-brew-the-coffee-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brooks&#8217; Strange Brew</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/08/brooks-strange-brew/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/08/brooks-strange-brew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times token conservative David Brooks always has an interesting take on the tea party movement (See his previous piece on the movement where he contrasts tea partiers with the "educated class.") Mr. Brooks' most recent reading of the tea leaves is equally...intriguing. Take Brooks' summary of the tea party movement which he contorts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New York Times</em> token conservative David Brooks always has an interesting take on the tea party movement (<a href="http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/06/tea-party-hit-jobs-continue/">See his previous piece</a> on the movement where he contrasts tea partiers with the "educated class.")</p>
<p>Mr. Brooks' <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/05/opinion/05brooks.html">most recent reading</a> of the tea leaves is equally...intriguing.  </p>
<p>Take Brooks' summary of the tea party movement which he contorts to fit his cute narrative comparing tea partiers to the 60's radicals of the New Left:</p>
<blockquote><p>The people we loosely call the Tea Partiers also want to destroy the establishment. They also want to take on The Man, return power to the people, upend the elites and lead a revolution.</p></blockquote>
<p>Brooks goes on to characterization of the tea party movement as preoccupied with black helicopter theories:</p>
<blockquote><p>In its short life, the Tea Party movement has developed a dizzying array of conspiracy theories involving the Fed, the F.B.I., the big banks and corporations and black helicopters.</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm curious to know how many tea parties Brooks has gone to and how many tea partiers he's interviewed in order to form the opinion that informs his commentary.  Based on my experience organizing, participating in, and documenting the tea party movement, Brooks' generalizations of the tea party movement bears no correlation with reality.  The tea party movement is in fact a mainstream, grassroots coalition of Americans concerned with the direction of this nation.  Brooks would likely draw a different conclusion were he to look beyond the pages of his own paper.  Sadly, Mr. Brooks appears to suffer from the same delusion as many of his colleagues: that the reporting on the pages of the <em>Times</em> truly is an accurate portrayal of "all the news that's fit to print." </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/08/brooks-strange-brew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBN Happy Hour Discussing Palin, Tea Party, CPAC</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/20/fbn-happy-hour-discussing-palin-tea-party-cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/20/fbn-happy-hour-discussing-palin-tea-party-cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yZtVuB5iUsc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yZtVuB5iUsc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/20/fbn-happy-hour-discussing-palin-tea-party-cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC This Week</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/15/cpac-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/15/cpac-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm excited and honored to be attending and participating in CPAC 2010 beginning this Thursday. I'll be participating in the following panel: Thursday, February 18th - 11:45am "Saving Freedom One Patriot at a Time" Marriott Ballroom Ginni Thomas, LibertyCentral.org Dana Loesch, St. Louis Tea Party Jenny Beth Martin, Tea Party Patriots Moderator: Andrew Moylan, NTU [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">I'm excited and honored to be attending and participating in CPAC 2010 beginning this Thursday.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I'll be participating in the following panel:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cpac.org" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-1071 alignleft" title="CPAC10_235x135" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/CPAC10_235x135.gif" alt="" width="225" height="129" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Thursday, February 18</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> - 11:45am</strong><br />
"Saving Freedom One Patriot at a Time"<br />
<em>Marriott Ballroom</em><br />
<strong>Ginni Thomas</strong>, LibertyCentral.org<br />
<strong>Dana Loesch</strong>, St. Louis Tea Party<br />
<strong>Jenny Beth Martin</strong>, Tea Party Patriots <em><br />
</em><em>Moderator:</em> <strong>Andrew Moylan</strong>, NTU</p>
<p>Afterwards, I'll be signing copies of <a href="http://www.anewamericanteaparty.com" target="_blank"><em>A New American Tea Party</em></a> in the main exhibit hall. Stop on by if you're at CPAC!</p>
<p>If you aren't already coming, be sure to check out the impressive agenda <a href="http://www.cpac.org/agenda_20708.html">here</a>. Online registration is closed, but you can show up and register for a few different packages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/15/cpac-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party Nation</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/14/the-tea-party-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/14/the-tea-party-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great op-ed in the Sacramento Bee this weekend on the recent tea party convention, the media spin of same, and the real principles - and people - behind the tea party movement. Writes Ben Boychuk: What tea parties represent is a revival of good, old-fashioned constitutionalism and the idea that government needs to get back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great op-ed in the <em>Sacramento Bee </em>this weekend on the recent tea party convention, the media spin of same, and the real principles - and people - behind the tea party movement.</p>
<p>Writes Ben Boychuk:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">What tea parties represent is a revival of good, old-fashioned constitutionalism and the idea that government needs to get back to basics. There is a great yearning for a return to first principles. Millions of Americans, but perhaps not yet a majority, would very much like to restore the principles of the American Founding Fathers to their rightful and pre-eminent place in our political life.</p>
<p>Read the full piece <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/740/story/2534259-p2.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/14/the-tea-party-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOTU Wish: Stop Talking</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wish-stop-talking/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wish-stop-talking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my debut piece at The Daily Caller, I outline why Americans are so frustrated with President Obama just one year after his inauguration: the rhetoric and the reality just don't match up.  President Obama has broken the trust of the American people too many times in such a short window of time.  It's time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wishes-a-lot-less-talk-a-lot-more-action/">debut piece at The Daily Caller</a>, I outline why Americans are so frustrated with President Obama just one year after his inauguration: the rhetoric and the reality just don't match up.  President Obama has broken the trust of the American people too many times in such a short window of time.  It's time for less talk and more (substantive) action.</p>
<p>Below, Paul Bedard at US News &amp; World Report has a great wrap-up of the growing discontent across party lines throughout the nation.</p>
<p><center><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/moDiiKO1K2c&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/moDiiKO1K2c&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wish-stop-talking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puzzling Media Attention Re. One Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/puzzling-media-attention-re-one-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/puzzling-media-attention-re-one-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times and other outlets that haven’t given the enormously popular and politically potent tea party movement the time of day over the past year are suddenly quite interested in covering it. Many political and media elites wrote the movement off as “fringe” – an irrelevant, small cadre of disgruntled right-wingers not worthy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Puzzling.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-942" title="87505653" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Puzzling-300x197.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="164" /></a>The <em>New York Times </em>and other outlets that haven’t given the enormously popular and politically potent tea party movement the time of day over the past year are suddenly quite interested in covering it.</p>
<p>Many political and media elites wrote the movement off as “fringe” – an irrelevant, small cadre of disgruntled right-wingers not worthy of their attention. As I <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/27/inside-the-beltway-86728839/">told</a> the <em>Washington Times</em>, know that they smell a hint of controversy, they’re suddenly quite <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/us/politics/26teaparty.html">intrigued</a>.</p>
<p>Many in the media are quick to point out the missteps of this one group in TN throwing a convention with Sarah Palin as signs that the movement is in trouble.  They see one event, one organization hitting bumps in the road and conclude from there that there is a significant rift in the movement.</p>
<p>It is particularly curious given that these very journalists, commentators, and politicians have to date characterized the movement as directionless and leaderless.  The former has been proven untrue beyond doubt in the wake of the election of Scott Brown in my bluer than blue home state of Massachusetts.  The later is true: this isn’t a top down movement by any means, and I argue that it doesn’t need a leader.  This movement’s power comes from the millions of concerned Americans that constitute it.  The movement rejects the creepy idolatry exhibited in the past presidential campaign. It represents an important shift away from partisanship and personalities to <em>principles. </em></p>
<p>If only there was one book out there journos could take for a spin that clearly articulates the history of and principles behind this powerful grassroots movement…</p>
<p>The bottom line is, if millions of people getting involved in the political process through protests, town halls, and marches over the past year weren’t newsworthy, the attention given to a couple thousand in TN is…curious.  Maybe I’m just being cynical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/puzzling-media-attention-re-one-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
