<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John M. O&#039;Hara</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnmohara.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnmohara.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Brooks&#8217; Strange Brew</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/08/brooks-strange-brew/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/08/brooks-strange-brew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times token conservative David Brooks always has an interesting take on the tea party movement (See his previous piece on the movement where he contrasts tea partiers with the "educated class.")
Mr. Brooks' most recent reading of the tea leaves is equally...intriguing.  
Take Brooks' summary of the tea party movement which he contorts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New York Times</em> token conservative David Brooks always has an interesting take on the tea party movement (<a href="http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/06/tea-party-hit-jobs-continue/">See his previous piece</a> on the movement where he contrasts tea partiers with the "educated class.")</p>
<p>Mr. Brooks' <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/05/opinion/05brooks.html">most recent reading</a> of the tea leaves is equally...intriguing.  </p>
<p>Take Brooks' summary of the tea party movement which he contorts to fit his cute narrative comparing tea partiers to the 60's radicals of the New Left:</p>
<blockquote><p>The people we loosely call the Tea Partiers also want to destroy the establishment. They also want to take on The Man, return power to the people, upend the elites and lead a revolution.</p></blockquote>
<p>Brooks goes on to characterization of the tea party movement as preoccupied with black helicopter theories:</p>
<blockquote><p>In its short life, the Tea Party movement has developed a dizzying array of conspiracy theories involving the Fed, the F.B.I., the big banks and corporations and black helicopters.</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm curious to know how many tea parties Brooks has gone to and how many tea partiers he's interviewed in order to form the opinion that informs his commentary.  Based on my experience organizing, participating in, and documenting the tea party movement, Brooks' generalizations of the tea party movement bears no correlation with reality.  The tea party movement is in fact a mainstream, grassroots coalition of Americans concerned with the direction of this nation.  Brooks would likely draw a different conclusion were he to look beyond the pages of his own paper.  Sadly, Mr. Brooks appears to suffer from the same delusion as many of his colleagues: that the reporting on the pages of the <em>Times</em> truly is an accurate portrayal of "all the news that's fit to print." </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/08/brooks-strange-brew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tribune&#8217;s A+ Education Editorial</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/04/tribunes-a-education-editorial/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/04/tribunes-a-education-editorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More great news on the school choice front here in Chicago.
This week, the Chicago Tribune endorsed Democratic State Senator Reverend James Meeks' voucher plan that would allow over 35,000 kids in struggling Chicago public school access to a quality education:
Meeks is trying valiantly to shake up the status quo in public education, and we stand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-vouchers-20100302,0,7726504.story"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1125" title="Chicago Trib" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Chicago-Trib-300x54.png" alt="" width="228" height="41" /></a>More great news on the school choice front here in Chicago.</p>
<p>This week, the <em>Chicago Tribune</em> <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-vouchers-20100302,0,7726504.story">endorsed</a> Democratic State Senator Reverend James Meeks' voucher plan that would allow over 35,000 kids in struggling Chicago public school access to a quality education:</p>
<blockquote><p>Meeks is trying valiantly to shake up the status quo in public education, and we stand with him in that effort. He is pushing a solid plan to create a voucher program for Chicago. The Senate's executive subcommittee on education is set to discuss the bill on Wednesday.<a href="http://www.IllinoisPolicy.org"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1124" title="Illinois-Policy-Institute-final" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Illinois-Policy-Institute-final.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="58" /></a></p></blockquote>
<p>Read the entire piece <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-vouchers-20100302,0,7726504.story">here</a>. For more on the Institute's work on education reform, click <a href="http://illinoispolicy.org/search/index.asp?searchfield=Education&amp;Submit=Submit">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/03/04/tribunes-a-education-editorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choice We Can Believe In</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/24/choice-we-can-believe-in/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/24/choice-we-can-believe-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Policy Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vouchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal  featured the Illinois Policy Institute's recent efforts to advance a voucher program for students in Chicago's struggling public schools along with State Senator Reverend James Meeks:
'The voucher movement seems to have been born, or seems to have been started as a Republican idea. That's the way Democrats look at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the <em>Wall Street Journal </em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704454304575081804053775266.html">featured</a> the Illinois Policy Institute's recent efforts to advance a voucher program for students in Chicago's struggling public schools along with State Senator Reverend James Meeks:</p>
<blockquote><p>'The voucher movement seems to have been born, or seems to have been started as a Republican idea. That's the way Democrats look at it. That's the way black lawmakers look at it. This is a Republican idea. This is what the Republicans want to push on us. . . . We don't seem to see public schools not working in your area."</p>
<p>The speaker was the Rev. James Meeks, explaining black resistance to vouchers. The venue was a sold-out lunch put on by the Illinois Policy Institute (IPI). The result? Something new in Windy City politics: a powerful black Democrat reaching out to a free-market think tank to force reform on the city's most hidebound institution—the Chicago public schools. </p></blockquote>
<p>As my colleague Collin Hitt <a href="http://www.illinoispolicy.org/blog/blog.asp?ArticleSource=2170">wrote</a> in the <em>Southtown Star</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Meeks is pursuing a voucher program that would allow thousands of impoverished families a choice of schools. This new power for parents promises that many children can enroll in schools that are better able to meet their needs. It promises that surrounding public schools will improve, and it promises that everyone in Illinois, as taxpayers, will benefit.</p></blockquote>
<p>For more on the work we're doing at the Institute to advance liberty in Illinois and beyond, check out <a href="http://www.IllinoisPolicy.org">www.IllinoisPolicy.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/24/choice-we-can-believe-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBN Happy Hour Discussing Palin, Tea Party, CPAC</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/20/fbn-happy-hour-discussing-palin-tea-party-cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/20/fbn-happy-hour-discussing-palin-tea-party-cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yZtVuB5iUsc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yZtVuB5iUsc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/20/fbn-happy-hour-discussing-palin-tea-party-cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Policy Institute</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/16/illinois-policy-institute/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/16/illinois-policy-institute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am excited to be officially joining the Illinois Policy Institute, effective today.
Founded in 2002, the Institute has enjoyed tremendous growth and success advancing liberty-based public policy initiatives in Illinois.
The Institute houses a number of projects geared towards turning Illinois into a beacon of liberty in the Midwest. In addition to robust policy centers, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.illinoispolicy.org" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1017" title="IPI_logo" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IPI_logo.gif" alt="" width="134" height="88" /></a>I am excited to be officially joining the <a href="http://www.illinoispolicy.org" target="_blank">Illinois Policy Institute</a>, effective today.</p>
<p>Founded in 2002, the Institute has enjoyed tremendous growth and success advancing liberty-based public policy initiatives in Illinois.</p>
<p>The Institute houses a number of projects geared towards turning Illinois into a beacon of liberty in the Midwest. In addition to <a href="http://illinoispolicy.org/content/?section=470">robust policy centers</a>, the Institute is home to a cutting-edge <a href="http://www.openillinois.org/">transparency project</a>, a <a href="http://illinoispolicy.org/search/index.asp?searchfield=Liberty+Leaders&amp;Submit=Submit">"Liberty Leaders" grassroots force</a>, and much more.</p>
<p>I'm very excited to be joining this impressive team.</p>
<p>Check out our latest policy publication, the <a href="http://illinoispolicy.org/news/article.asp?ArticleSource=2105" target="_blank">2010 Illinois Piglet Booklet</a>. A joint venture with <a href="http://www.cagw.org/">Citizens Against Government Waste</a>, the booklet details just some of the wasteful spending of Illinois taxpayer dollars:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>$6,500 for a tub of live bass.</strong> The state paid for fishing seminars and demonstrations using a 4,000 gallon, 40-foot long tank filled with live fish.</li>
<li><strong>$353,165 for car racing.</strong> The state is funding Raceway Associates, which partners with big-time  races like the Indianapolis 500 and the Daytona 500, as well as a massive construction grant for Atkinson  Motorsports Park in northwestern Illinois. <a href="http://illinoispolicy.org/news/article.asp?ArticleSource=2105" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1062" title="2010PigletBookButton" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2010PigletBookButton.jpg" alt="" width="121" height="84" /></a></li>
<li><strong>$10,000 for a Batman gala.</strong> Your tax  dollars funded a star-studded party for “Dark Knight” director Christopher Nolan.</li>
<li><strong>$1,100 for Hawaiian party props.</strong> Your  money made its way to Island Enterprises, a company providing “everything for luaus and Hawaiian themed events from dancers to music to props and apparel.”</li>
<li><strong>$78,066 for quail promotion.</strong> The state is funding Quail Unlimited, which is “dedicated to the wise use and management of America’s wild quail, doves, upland game birds and other forms of wildlife.”</li>
</ul>
<p>Check out the booklet and more of our work at <a href="http://www.IllinoisPolicy.org" target="_blank">www.IllinoisPolicy.org </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/16/illinois-policy-institute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC This Week</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/15/cpac-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/15/cpac-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm excited and honored to be attending and participating in CPAC 2010 beginning this Thursday.
I'll be participating in the following panel:

Thursday, February 18th - 11:45am
"Saving Freedom One Patriot at a Time"
Marriott Ballroom
Ginni Thomas, LibertyCentral.org
Dana Loesch, St. Louis Tea Party
Jenny Beth Martin, Tea Party Patriots 
Moderator: Andrew Moylan, NTU
Afterwards, I'll be signing copies of A New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">I'm excited and honored to be attending and participating in CPAC 2010 beginning this Thursday.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I'll be participating in the following panel:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cpac.org" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-1071 alignleft" title="CPAC10_235x135" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/CPAC10_235x135.gif" alt="" width="225" height="129" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Thursday, February 18</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> - 11:45am</strong><br />
"Saving Freedom One Patriot at a Time"<br />
<em>Marriott Ballroom</em><br />
<strong>Ginni Thomas</strong>, LibertyCentral.org<br />
<strong>Dana Loesch</strong>, St. Louis Tea Party<br />
<strong>Jenny Beth Martin</strong>, Tea Party Patriots <em><br />
</em><em>Moderator:</em> <strong>Andrew Moylan</strong>, NTU</p>
<p>Afterwards, I'll be signing copies of <a href="http://www.anewamericanteaparty.com" target="_blank"><em>A New American Tea Party</em></a> in the main exhibit hall. Stop on by if you're at CPAC!</p>
<p>If you aren't already coming, be sure to check out the impressive agenda <a href="http://www.cpac.org/agenda_20708.html">here</a>. Online registration is closed, but you can show up and register for a few different packages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/15/cpac-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party Nation</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/14/the-tea-party-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/14/the-tea-party-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great op-ed in the Sacramento Bee this weekend on the recent tea party convention, the media spin of same, and the real principles - and people - behind the tea party movement.
Writes Ben Boychuk:
What tea parties represent is a revival of good, old-fashioned constitutionalism and the idea that government needs to get back to basics. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great op-ed in the <em>Sacramento Bee </em>this weekend on the recent tea party convention, the media spin of same, and the real principles - and people - behind the tea party movement.</p>
<p>Writes Ben Boychuk:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">What tea parties represent is a revival of good, old-fashioned constitutionalism and the idea that government needs to get back to basics. There is a great yearning for a return to first principles. Millions of Americans, but perhaps not yet a majority, would very much like to restore the principles of the American Founding Fathers to their rightful and pre-eminent place in our political life.</p>
<p>Read the full piece <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/740/story/2534259-p2.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/14/the-tea-party-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Green Police</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/09/the-green-police/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/09/the-green-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By far the funniest ad I've ever seen that mocks the "green" culture aired during the Super Bowl:

Some environmentalists were predictably steamed, going so far as to state that Audi was equating environmental regulation with the Nazis...  Others, like David Roberts hailed the ad as a recognition of the "moral authority" of so-called greening, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By far the funniest ad I've ever seen that mocks the "green" culture aired during the Super Bowl:</p>
<p><center><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ml54UuAoLSo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ml54UuAoLSo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Some environmentalists were predictably <a href="http://getenergysmartnow.com/2010/02/07/the-most-environmentally-unfriendly-super-bowl-ad/">steamed</a>, going so far as to state that Audi was equating environmental regulation with the Nazis...  Others, like David Roberts <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2010-02-08-the-unheralded-significance-of-the-audi-green-police-ad/">hailed</a> the ad as a recognition of the "moral authority" of so-called greening, but not after getting in some particularly gratuitous "teabag" references.</p>
<p>Both are wrong. The ad brilliantly mocks a world that makes such "green" selling points necessary.  Corporations in all industries are "going green" for PR (and often in name only) not because of "morality," but because it is in vogue -  "green" is the new black. Roberts, like many others, seems to buy into the global warming religion.  It blinds him from what is a hilarious commercial mocking the nanny statist meddlers and junk science peddlers that want to tell us what kind of car we can drive and how high we can have our thermostat.  Force us to "go green" through regulation?  Fine, I'll buy a diesel Audi that fits into your arbitrary metrics to solve a problem that doesn't exist and cruise down the highway as fast and as much as I want.  It's a joke, enviros, and the joke is on you.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/02/09/the-green-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy Prescription for Obama</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/30/policy-prescription-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/30/policy-prescription-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new post at Big Government, Peter Fotos and I answer President Obama's call for help by giving him three simple health care policy prescriptions:
In his State of the Union Address Wednesday night, President Obama called on folks to let him know if there are better health care solutions he and congress should be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/87574571.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-967 alignright" title="1001753096" src="http://johnmohara.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/87574571-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="158" height="104" /></a>In a new <a href="http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/29/real-health-care-solutions-letting-o-know/">post at Big Government</a>, Peter Fotos and I answer President Obama's call for help by giving him three simple health care policy prescriptions:</p>
<blockquote><p>In his State of the Union Address Wednesday night, President Obama called on folks to let him know if there are better health care solutions he and congress should be considering...</p>
<p>...He echoed this sentiment at today’s House GOP retreat.  Some might say he was being sarcastic, reminding us of how hard it is to govern (especially in light of all he has inherited from you-know-who.)  But that would be cynical, particularly in this post-partisan era.</p>
<p>Just before Christmas my colleague Peter Fotos and I penned a “wish list” of simple policy proposals that constitute substantive health care reform – and it didn’t even take 1,000 pages! The health care snitch line was disabled, so we’ll give the President the benefit of the doubt that it ended up in his spam folder.</p>
<p>President Obama and his Congressional allies talk a lot about the need to control health care costs and avoid pressure from special interests.  Unfortunately, neither the House nor the Senate versions of “ObamaCare” that he called upon congress to reconsider withstand either litmus test.</p></blockquote>
<p>Click <a href="http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/29/real-health-care-solutions-letting-o-know/">here</a> for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/30/policy-prescription-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOTU Wish: Stop Talking</title>
		<link>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wish-stop-talking/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wish-stop-talking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New American Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmohara.com/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my debut piece at The Daily Caller, I outline why Americans are so frustrated with President Obama just one year after his inauguration: the rhetoric and the reality just don't match up.  President Obama has broken the trust of the American people too many times in such a short window of time.  It's time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wishes-a-lot-less-talk-a-lot-more-action/">debut piece at The Daily Caller</a>, I outline why Americans are so frustrated with President Obama just one year after his inauguration: the rhetoric and the reality just don't match up.  President Obama has broken the trust of the American people too many times in such a short window of time.  It's time for less talk and more (substantive) action.</p>
<p>Below, Paul Bedard at US News &amp; World Report has a great wrap-up of the growing discontent across party lines throughout the nation.</p>
<p><center><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/moDiiKO1K2c&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/moDiiKO1K2c&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmohara.com/2010/01/27/sotu-wish-stop-talking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
